Dog Latin, Foreign Corporate Governments and the DOG-LATIN effect. The Poison in the Gloss and How to Use it to Win.
Republished and updated by www.youarelaw.org
A POWERFUL METHOD TO DISQUALIFY A CURRENT CASE OR EVEN VOID A PAST CASE. Use what you can in almost any case.
The Science Of English: (Grammar) May Overrule All Presumptions. (False impressions)
This is an interesting insight into how foreign, private corporate governments are deceiving the people of the western world into a “not guilty plea”, when that guilty plea may be the only grammatically correct thing to do.
It appears that this governing system is meant for the ignorant and illiterate in order to control such masses. No matter how much we try and fight the system for its crimes against you, if you are ignorant to the grammatical rules of the written text used on documents, you will never beat such a system.
You have been DOGGED by the Egyptian DOG-MAN-SYMBOL: Anubis, Egyptian Gods of the UNDERWORLD. The Science Of English: (Grammar) May Overrule All Presumptions. (False impressions)
Anubis.
Anubis, one of the Gods of the Underworld, in charge of preserving the body on the slim chance that the dead come back to life. the DOG-LATIN text is found on the tombstones of a grave.
Dog Latin is the “engraved image” on the tomb, the written text of the dead. It is debased Latin, appearing as a written sign language without the hyphens.
Written Sign, subject to the grammatical rules of Latin, appears in ALL UPPERCASE TEXT LIKE ON MOST LEGAL PAPER AND COURT CASES.
What is DOG-LATIN? From https://thelawdictionary.org/dog-latin
The Latin of illiterate persons; Latin words put together on the English grammatical system.
“WHEN THIS TYPE OF ALL UPPERCASE TEXT APPEARS ON A DOCUMENT”, appearing to be “Dog Latin”, (Latin all UPPERCASE TEXT appearing under the grammatical rules of English), such a text does not destroy the vitality of such a document! Refer to GRAMMA FALSA NON VITATE CHARTAM: Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition: (Below). It is saying that the document “Is what it is” in its grammatical standing, meaning. The truth and deception appear at the same time.
BIG HOWEVER – that the document is grammatically saying nothing when such a document is appearing in the corrupt “DOG-LATIN” text. Focus on that issue alone.
The fact stands as stating that the bad grammar does not destroy such a document, it renders such a document as it “grammatically” stands. Another way to look at it is that it is true correct grammatical meaning is telling you that such a document is what it is, it is not destroyed (If the writer constructs a bad grammatical document, the document is not bad, it appears as it grammatically appears, such a dogged document is a reflection of the poor ability of the “bad” writer of such a document OR (the biggie) an act of the writer to overtly deceive his fellow man by using grammatical tricks in order to hide something. The truth and the lie appear at the same time.
When: “Commonwealth Of Australia“, appears on paper as: “COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA”, the grammatical fact is saying that its translation into English appears as: “Commonwealth. Of. Australia.” (3 separate full stop words), and is not the same as “Commonwealth Of Australia”. (Notice the full stops “ . “).
Only an ignorant false impression would render such a presumption as the true correct: “Commonwealth of Australia” (This will apply to all western nations.) Be aware that a clever grammatical writer may have the grammatical ability to write a document that gives a false impression of something that grammatically DOES NOT EXIST in fact. Such a false impression tendered as something other than what it truly is, could be deemed as a counterfeit if one is attempting to “Pass it Off” as something, other than its grammatical correct facts. A counterfeit is simply the act of passing something off that is false for something that is real.
So where is the “deception” one may ask, when its not in the grammar? The deception relates to the “false impression” that a document appearing in DOG-LATIN, so it contains ALL UPPERCASE TEXT usurped into such a document which is something other than what it truly appears to be. A wise writer knows what they are doing. If the reader assumes such a document to be something other than the grammatical fact, than such a reader’s “ignorance” to English Grammar is his own downfall, in defining the grammatical facts appearing on such a document. The Grammatical standing of the document is always what it is = a deception.
However, you can volunteer for that jurisdiction court or claim, just by going along while not pointing out these deceptions.
We the people, are the creator (sovereign) our government, but one also has the right to contract right back under the power of government. They always need you to volunteer (Using your ignorance).
But hey, you wanted the benefit of their government dumbing down schools, right? Be careful what you wish for.
One’s ignorance and failure to act is our own downfall. Ignorance is no excuse in law and if you “ignorantly” assume that you can read DOG latin they put on those documents, when in fact your grammatical ability may be poor due to their deception, then you may be in danger by being subject to the grammatical ability of those that possess an immoral intention against you. This is done in order to deceive the ignorant masses into assuming such a decepting document to be valid. As you can see, it’s never the fault of the document itself, the fault appears with the ignorant perception of such a document and your failing to make THAT the issue of the matter first.
The fact of the case might be true, heck …plead “guilty to the facts” vs “not guilty” or “guilty”. You attorney will flip, but he doesn’t go to jail for you does he?
“I Plead guilty to the facts, so long as the court and plaintiff/prosecutor and provide proof why the court should not hold them for contempt and fraud on the court” “Why? The court and plaintiff/prosecutor fail to provide full disclosure as to why they are using deceptive DOG latin grammar, mixing all capital letter words of a trust name, who is not me, and mixing it with english on the face of the documents. Thus rendering portion of the document blank. Where do the parties presume get my authorization to use DOG latin deception grammar on the record, thus deceiving I, the beneficiary, to lose status to the public trustee, which is the court? Explain why this was not disclosed for my full understanding in the complaint and evidence. Knowing this now, explain how this deception is not mis applying jurisdiction and misleading me, and explain why it should not be dismissed at this time”.
Don’t forget, this is also a warning against the one who constructs such a DOGGED document that contains a foreign text for immoral purposes, the risk of a clever grammatical writer constructing such a document that intends to deceive, falls upon the one that constructed such a document, meaning, he who creates owns, rendering the author of such a deceptive document to be the one liable for it in the end.
Who would have ever assumed that “THIS TYPE OF ALL UPPERCASE TEXT WAS NOT ENGLISH”. People have become so ignorant that they will even argue the point that THIS TEXT IS ENGLISH, and why? because they “assume” that they can read it! Meanwhile, grammatically, it reads as something other than what is normally assumed. Such all upper case text is a SYMBOLIC TEXT. It is a “sign” not a word, and in relation to article 11:147 of the Chicago Manual of Styles, such all uppercase text is American Sign Language, without-the-hyphens between each word (SIGN), rendering such all uppercase text “APPEARING LOOKING LIKE THIS” to be the debased-immoral-criminal: Dog Latin.
Why Courts love the “Not Guilty Plea”
“Not Guilty”, creates the “Conflict”, giving the foreign corporate State, (Your quasi corporate foreign government) the ability to engage in War. (Warrant: War-Rant). Saying Not Guilty, is an “acceptance” of the charge and an intention to “Defend”, rendering such a governing state to assume that YOU now have accepted liability as trustee for the corrupt “charges”, and refuse to accept responsibility to pay the “charge”. All done with a document dogged in Dog Latin, and that now you intend to DEFEND it as “DEFENDANT”.
The Guilty Plea or qualified Guilty Plea – is really the right move as it forces the State to prove its “charging” paperwork used against you to be valid. This causes the State to be subjected to the fraud for “Deception in the name and grammar”…but not if you don’t bring it up.
No “charge” can be issued to a “creditor” (you), it’s numerically impossible! Only a “debtor” can accept the charge in a corporate governing system. You are not a debtor unless you volunteer for that role in court. By entering a Not Guilty Plea you throw yourself under that bus (advice with your “good court dedicated attorney” pushing you in the fire pit). As a result, you give up your creditor power-position. However, if the presumed-debtor (you now) becomes aware that such a charge is corrupt, and you point out their deception defects, such a “charge” (allegation) will fall back upon the one that created it!
Therefore the “not guilty” plea saves the state from answering to its own fraud, because YOU didn’t bring it up first, and you then took on the liability voluntarily.
Thinking about changing your plea or ammend how you answered the suit originally now?
If the Courts and the Enforcement agencies of such courts start to enforce the wrong-presumption of a grammatical-fact of a document, than the court is making the error in it’s uttering upon you, by tendering a false document. As long as the court knows that the defendant is ignorant of such an error, the court can move toward a “Not Guilty Plea” (they will do it for you if you dont address this). And all of this if being done in relation to a grammatically DOGGED document, in order to safely proceed without THEIR own risk. Thinking about correcting your error now?
The “not guilty plea” is your ignorant “acceptance” of the deception, confirmed by your acceptance/actions that you intend to defend. You do it to yourself – with the advice of your “good attorney”. The plea of “not guilty” is the consent that you agree to the false-deception-presumption of the content of the charge, and evidence against you that you want to act in dishonor and defend the “Presumed” charge. (Remember, a charging paper, dogged in DOG-LATIN, grammatically does not exist).
This is why many sovereign/patriots out there who really don’t have full understanding, say the system is fiction. It their courts and papers really are fiction, blank papers, but this explains why and now you have the proof. It only works if you volunteer to play.
However, if your understood the true grammatical appearance of such a document, your “guilty to the facts plea” is simply saying that you are guilty to “a nothing”. This is because, grammatically speaking, the “charges” on the paper never existed, nor does the so called DEFENDANT. Quite a magic trick huh?
The “not guilty plea” also gives the presumption that you agree to be governed and adjudicated by such a private foreign corporate banking system (Tribunal), alien to your true de-jure common law government. It is Treason in the true fact but lucky for you, you were unaware that such a foreign private corporate government has secretly usurped itself into your real common law government. This has deceived you into the false presumption that “your government” is real, when in fact it is a “foreign criminal counterfeit” going on. But you can volunteer into it if you believe in it.
So ask for disclosure of the deception and meaning of these things. Keep asking how they can proceed while these deceptive grammar issues are going on here? Then they ask you if you understand, you waive this argument, so you may have go back and correct this problem. Errors can be corrected, but it get harder as you go. This has been done by keeping you illiterate and ignorant to the true rules of your own written language, grammar and its Latin roots. Please ask for more government education?
Crime of Uttering:
HOWEVER – If you are forced to act as a defendant of a foreign corporate “charge” against your will (Coercion), and then INSTEAD and intelligently enter the plea as “guilty”, or better yet use “Guilty to the Fact” and requiring the court determine if the one pleading is aware of the grammatical standing “facts” of the document itself, because a charge dogged in: DOG-LATIN which is grammatically saying nothing. You do NOT understand a blank paper – do you?
There is no “grammatically charge” on the face of the paper instruments, therefore a “guilty plea” is an agreement to a document that has no charge appearing. Why? Again, because its been poisoned by the poisonous gloss that corrupts the essence of the text: DOG-LATIN.
What is the danger for the Court at this point?
Such a court is tendering (Dealing with or passing off) a deceptive /false document and that in itself is criminal, that is “uttering”. See Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition for “Uttering”. This type of conduct is found more in relation to foreign private banks acting as Governments and Police, when in fact, they are not. Such private banks acting as Government are mere color of law, de-facto, or counterfeit governments (no authority over you anyway).
The only way the court can proceed to charge you with anything is that you agree to the false impression of such a charge, because the charge sheet document grammatically becomes the fact that there is no charge on the papers. (Refer to Deception: Attached: Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition)
The deception relates to someone attempting to deceive another person in relation to a false presumption, other than the fact. If the grammatical facts state that a “Charge sheet” from the Court dogged in DOG-LATIN grammatically states nothing. The Court is conspiring with others in attempting to portray a false presumption in relation to such a document which states nothing. The deception is from whoever owns and operates the Court.
If you are aware of the Grammatical facts relating to such a charge, or you are forced to deal with such a document that you know that is actually deceptively-grammatically stating that there is no charge, because it is Dogged (Corrupted), than the Court (STATE) is than at fault and stands as the criminal for enforcing a false presumption. (Uttering a forged document).
So you need to point this out and move the court to recognize this deception-grammar with perhaps a Motion for Judicial Notice of these issues with the indictment or a Motion to Strike and Dismiss the indictment for fraud and deception by yoruopponend and the court in conspiracy with them.
Re: The GRAMMA FALSA NON VITATE CHARTAM, (Above) There is no actual corruption of the document, it is simply stating that the document is what it is…its grammatical meaning hides nothing, its Grammar is telling you everything. Re: The true grammatical fact is on its face (Its true grammatical standing in fact). The document hides nothing but your own ignorance, and causes your lack of ability to see the deception relating to the false impression you can see on such a document.
The false world of corruption is the occult “flat Earth” world of Babylon, and if you become a “citizen” of such a world. If you are holding any account dogged in DOG-LATIN documents), such as a Driver License, Passport, or Bank Card, you have become a presumed “citizen” of such a false quasi dogged world. Be careful not to become “subject to” the false presumptions conferred to you by such a criminal occult corrupt world being: Babylon. All of those document us the same process deceptively. It is NOT your name on them. You just use them, andhav done so without knowing the risk they may cause you if you are not aware.
So Where Is The Deception?
So Where Is The Deception: Re: Deception (Attachment): The “deception” is the “false impression” other than what such a document is grammatically appearing as. The corruption and deception relates to the “wrong impression” of the true correct grammatical facts. The document is what it is, but the one who deceives is the one who is attempting to create a false impression to the grammatical true facts. Such a person is the one taking the “risk” that the masses are unaware that “THIS TYPE OF DOG LATIN FOREIGN TEXT” was nether LATIN or English. So point this it out to the court.
DOG-LATIN has no jurisdiction with either Latin or English if appearing on the same document with Latin text or English text, so what is it doing on Court and Police and Banking Documents? It is the jurisdiction of BABYLON, the “debtor” of the VATICAN.
If this is organized, such as an entity that enforces the false impression of a fact, being a fraud, than such an organization could be classed as a: Racketeering Organization; taking, lands, things, property and money-wealth from people under a false presumption and backed up by threat, intimidation, torture etc. Also see https://thelawdictionary.org/racketeer
Such crimes attract twenty year imprisonment to life sentences in a common law standing. If the foreign state Police service is a private organization registered to DUN & BRADSTREET, being a foreign entity. This is hard to find and operating its courts and charges under a DOG-LATIN deception in order to charge people for rights that already exist, such as freedom to travel in an automobile on public lands, than are all people involved with such an entity are criminal racketeer’s subject to life in prison or even death.
See 18 USC 1962 and See Blacks Law Dictionary: 4th Edition:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1962
Is This For Limited Liability?
So what is Limited Liability? This is where the STATE has conferred the presumptions (In a public TRUST format) to the Office Holders of the State, such as the Police and the Judges. The Judge is paid a lot of money because it is with his liability and skill, relating to his legal training and grammatical ability to deceive you (he collects big money from the people daily), on behalf of the foreign private company he serves. This knowledge is what enables him to hold that office successfully. (Nothing but a Pirate). The bible say we perish for our lack of knowledge…hmmm. The liability is no longer with the STATE when the Judge has agreed to hold the Office of Deception as the liable trustee.
The Judge should be skilled enough in order to identify a man that knows the grammatical facts of a document, in order that such a judge knows when to back away from attempting to confer a false paper ”charge” upon a man or woman. If such a Judge pushes such a matter by force, or threats or intimidation, it is with such a Judge that the liability will fall.
The grammatical standing of the document he is trying to deceive you with, will never change. That document itself becomes the evidence of the deception. IF the one who is being charged sees the grammatical problem, where the Police Racketeering Organization have attempted to tender such a false deceptive DOGGED instrument (DOG-LATIN), the Judge can and SHOULD instead admonish burn the Police or Prosecutor, who illegally and unlawfully is aware of the Fraud-Deception on the “charging papers”. IF the JUDGE is made aware you know of this concept and he proceeds in conspiracy ( 18 USC 371 ) with those parties, the liability will fall on him. So make your point and stay on it.
You can ENCOURAGE THEM TO DROP THE CHARGES for deception and fraud on the face of the charging papers/complaint indictment, equating to conspiracy by all involved, etc..
If the STATE (US Govt. or whoever) drops the charges, the STATE may be unharmed, thus limiting the liability from the foreign STATE he serves. The judge can avoid being liable as the grantee, trustee, and the administrator of such a deception. So let him off the hook and get out of there on your terms vs theirs.
A smart judge will know when to back down, if you point it out clearly in writing and in person if needed. When he knows YOU know that the deception-grammatical facts are endangering the false impression they are constructing, of a charge that does not grammatically exist – his mood will change. He my throw out some magician deceptions to get you off point, be ready for drama, and keep on this point. Do this even if you have to spend a night or 2 in jail to say protected. They will want you out of there quickly when you start rousting up other in the jail about this same issue. Do a 2 day seminar in there if you need to. Help your brother out while in there.
If the Corporate Police (UNIDROIT-DOGS) or Prosecutor confer a charge to a man, who is smart enough to point this issue out clearly in his pleadings, or who was not the holder of the Babylonian dogged accounts appearing in DOG-LATIN, (Such as a Driver License with your name dogged into DOG-LATIN), the Judge has no option to let you go eventually. He won’t burn either himself or the co-conspirator Police or Prosecutor/Plaintiff, that intentionally mistakenly conferred such an “account” to the “wrong man”. He will instead burn the ignorant officer that “applied” to act as the UNIDROIT DOG, before himself (Babylonian account holders).
As you can see, any document housing the DOG-LATIN all UPPERCASE text, is appearing with two distinct different languages (without disclosure to you), thus rendering translation to be needed for you, and as the Chicago Manual of Styles confirms.
There no jurisdiction between the two languages appearing on such a document, nor disclosure to you of this. If the written CHARGE or the NAMES or any part of such a document appears in ALL UPPERCASE Text, that is the “SIGN” (you clue) that such all uppercase text is rendering something “spurious”. The fact that Dog Latin is debased Latin renders such text as: Criminal, Immoral, and as a counterfeit. (Enter at own risk)
If you are not aware of the difference between: “THIS TEXT“, and “THIS-TEXT” and “This text”, than you are as good as legally dead and jail bait! You WILL voluntarily step into the trap.
“This is the director” and “THIS-IS-THE-ADMINISTRATOR” and “THIS IS THE DEBTOR TRUSTEE” being the Ledger (A ledger is the slab on a tombstone), and DOG-LATIN is the common TEXT on the tombstones in the “GRAVEYARD”.
IF you can prove using CAPS has another specific meaning other than for clarity or tradition, prove it.
Summing Up:
The deception appears in order to plunder the sovereign STATE (Your estate), by making you believe that you are “still” the true de-jure STATE. They must keep this illusion alive while they have conferred a false foreign debt LEDGER (a Trust name appearing in a NAME that looks like you) upon you, without your understanding and clear consent. They then plundering “their” account LEDGER at your expense.
That NAME only looks like your Name, meanwhile you are unwittingly assuming liability for “holding” that NAMED trust liability. Therefore you are presumed to be the liable “trustee” who has to take liability. You never want to assume that position as trustee. This gives them the legal ability to plunder the Mineral and Energy assets to your sovereign STATE, because you didn’t correct things first, while you hand it all over to them voluntarily. You failed to state your claim properly and point out the deception. He who fails to exert his right has none.
This is done by offering you the sealed “LEDGER” (Sealed in an Article) in a foreign dogged DOG-LATIN language document that you have accepted as true and merely assume to be common law English. You allowed this when in fact, such a written text is neither English or the official language of the VATICAN. being: “Latin”.
The moment you open (Unseal) and accept such an article, fail to point out these deception issues, you become the “holder” (liable) of a foreign private account LEDGER and liable for what is says. They got you at hello. At that point you are no longer assumed as the aggregate of the Sovereign “common law State”, you become the liable holding trustee of their foreign LEDGER. That LEDGER merely looks like your NAME, thus it renders your Sovereign State as the liable “Surety” of their LEDGER; a document that only looks like your Name, that has been DOGGED into DOG-LATIN. You unwittingly hold liability as the trustee of a foreign STATE. You are deceived by your own ignorance of Grammar and Latin and English being mixed together.
Dog Latin is a third party text, now known as “DOG-LATIN” (Attached), being an immorality, a debased declension of the real version of Latin. Grammatical rules of Latin and English states that grammatically, DOG-LATIN, is what it is: being: NOTHING but an immoral act against you..
And the Standard English version of Dog Latin:
DOG-LATIN is a debased form of Latin. So look at the meaning of the word “debased” in the standard Dictionary: Words such as “Criminal and Corrupt” appear. If DOG-LATIN appears on Government or police and Court Documents, that is your proof there exists a grammatical fact on the record, proving that such documents are Corrupt and Criminal. Do you see how this discovery exposes that such a Court their Police, and their Government are a Racketeering Criminal Corrupt entity?
Now you see how important it is that Corporate Foreign Governments of the New World Order, must hide the grammatical and Latin knowledge from the masses. A magician doesn’t reveal his deception techniques either, or he’s out of business. It is only the “illusion of power” that keeps them in power. Knowledge of grammar-Latin-deception may open your eyes to the facts of what is really happening right under your nose and other you care about, every day.
Therefore, focus on the right issue and state is clearly in your own words. It may not be the GLOSSA (Symbolic Text) that is the problem, it may be the Poisonous gloss deceptive mixing of language that corrupts the real meaning of the text. The issue is DOG-LATIN usage; the debased form of Latin that uses the English Grammatical Rules and not the proper Latin Grammatical rules, giving us the false impression that “THIS TYPE OF TEXT IS ENGLISH” This is done when in its true grammatical fact, it is “NOTHING” A BLANK PAGE.
Should you lose your case because of a piece of a deceptive paper page that is missing information? You decide how to play now – just go ahead and trust your “good attorney” instead.
… Justice: JUST-ICE… melts away into nothing. It’s just a blank space on the papers – stop thinking you “understand” them. You can’t understand blank spaces any more than I can. Stop fooling YOURSELF.